« April 2024 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics
Ad review
Advertising
Marketing
Media
Online marketing  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Stan's betaBlog: media marketing communications culture
Friday, 28 November 2008
Wazzup redux
Topic: Online marketing

Another one that I’m probably way late commenting on. But this is so well done… and I found it sweet that my 16-year-old son showed me this first. Neil was eight when the original came out.

The lingering power of a great ad. . . hard to believe the original film, and subsequent Bud spot, appeared before 911.

 

 
Change is gonna come.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 3:37 PM EST
Updated: Friday, 28 November 2008 3:58 PM EST
Lost in the Flood
Topic: Online marketing

I know this is sooo last week, but the contretemps over the Motrin online ad that offended a small group of “mommy bloggers” with active twitter accounts earlier this month (Ad Age is calling it “Motrin-Gate”) is emerging as an early case study in the perils of over-reacting to online social activism.

Topline reacap: Johnson & Johnson launched the online campaign targeting young mothers for Motrin, and created through the New York office of the
Canadian agency Taxi, at the end of September. The voice-over of the video featured a mom who said she carried her baby in a sling in part because she sees it as “a fashion statement” and made her feel like an “official mom.” It garnered reasonable traffic at motrin.com, but really hardly any notice until Nov 15, a Saturday, when a woman in Colorado commented negatively on the ad on her personal blog (she apparently found it condescending). Within hours that post cascaded into a couple of other blog posts and hundreds of twitter tweets per hour, which then got amplified by the original bloggers and picked up by the mainstream media, including a New York Times blog, the WSJ and Reuters. A day later –we’re talking Sunday- J&J pulled down the site. It reactivated the site the next day with an apology to anyone who was offended. At that point, the rest of the media had piled onto the story.

But as Paul Harvey used to say, “and now… the rest of the story.”

The Globe and Mail’s Mathew Ingram, writing a wrap-up analysis a whole four days later suggested J&J jumped the gun by yanking its ad. He termed the outcry a social media “flash flood” –essentially a dramatic, but temporary, storm that came and went within 72 hours that left very little lasting change in the overall environment.

Ingram also pointed out that a closer examination of the twitter posts showed a good proportion of them to be positive and supportive of the Motrin vid. A second Ad Age piece on the controversy this week expands on Matt’s thesis (and gives him props for coining the apt “flash flood” metaphor). It suggests best evidence is that there were probably only just over 1,000 people commenting on the whole Motrin question on Twitter –which it archly notes at this stage only accounts for “generously” 0.15 of Internet users in the U.S. – and of those only 35% were overtly negative, with the remainder neutral or positive. It calculates the total equivalent media value of all the online talk was no more than the cost of one 30 second spot on a cable news network.

Marketers and communicators are constantly being told they need to watch what’s being said about them in social media and react in real time. But the Motrin case underscores that there is perhaps such a thing as being too reactive.

Easy to say, mind you. When you’re in the middle of storm it’s hard to think straight. Especially when you’re not sure if you’re about to be hit by a temporary flash flood or by a Katrina-sized levy breach.

One of the people quotes in Ad Age suggests part of the problem for J&J is they may not have had systematic measurement tools and processes in place to figure out just what the reaction on things like Twitter really is.

Getting those kind of thing in place is a good start, although it probably won't help a whole lot just yet. At some point, there will be a commonly accepted understanding of how these things normally play out. Until then, we’ll likely see more situations like this.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 3:14 PM EST
Updated: Friday, 28 November 2008 3:29 PM EST
Thursday, 6 November 2008
Obama drives online marketing innovation - and sells newspapers
Topic: Online marketing
Aside from all the other heartening historic aspects of his big electoral win in America this week, much has been said and written about how the Barak Obama team made great innovative use of online communications tools, including Facebook and Myspace, to drive both record fundraising efforts and grass roots campaigning.

Diane Mermigas gave a great round-up of what occurred and some of its implications in her Election Day blog at Media Post. I recall CP+B’s Chuck Porter predicting last year that we’ll see another wave of innovations in ’09 and
10, as what got perfected in this election cycle marketing, especially in below the line direct and interactive activities, gets quickly disseminated into the general business world when all those campaign activities and consultants take “real” jobs in the private sector –for a time at least.

Meanwhile, daily newspapers took an unprecedented bounce on Wednesday as people rushed to snap up mementos of the historic day. The New York Times went to town on this, with a sweetly ironic piece that leads with the line: “For a day, at least, newspapers were cool again.”

I guess a screen capture of a Web portal news page doesn’t have the same keepsake appeal as yellowing paper.  But can you rebuild a publishing industry model around once a generation historic events?




Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 10:12 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 6 November 2008 10:20 AM EST
Tuesday, 3 June 2008
Almost like being there: The In:fluencia Digital/Infopresse Toronto Internet Marketing Conference
Topic: Online marketing

 

The events team at Editions Infopresse have pulled together a pretty cool video summary of our Toronto coming out, the May 15 Interactive Marketing Conference that featured Wired editor (and Long Tail author) Chris Anderson as the closing keynote. 

This video, which has been posted on YouTube, clocks in at just under ten minutes, and manages to include substantive comments from every participant, including the other keynoters social media thinker Paul Gillin, comScore Canada’s Bryan Segal and even the five panel participants: Dawna Henderson, Jesse Hirsh, David Jones, Mike Kasprow and moderator Keith McArthur.

Check it out. It’s almost like being there.
 

 

 


 
You can download PDFs of the key presentations here:

Chris Anderson

Paul Gillin

Bryan Segal

As well, here are links to some of the related press clippings around the event:

http://www.conversationalcapital.com/
http://www.mastheadonline.com/news/2008/20080516734.shtml
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=522291
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/Page/document/video/
vs?id=RTGAM.20080529.wvanderson0529

 

And finally, we’ve also posted photos from the day on flickr. The photographer, by the way, might be familiar to anyone who worked in Toronto agency circles in the past decade or two: Erwin Buck, who is clearly keeping the creative juices flowing in the wake of his early retirement from MacLaren: McCann a few years ago.

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 10:52 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 23 June 2008 11:39 AM EDT
Sunday, 1 June 2008
Web isn't an ad platform, it's a revolution
Topic: Online marketing

Every new medium and technology mimics the previous dominant media in their early awkward stages of development, Colleen DeCourcy, chief digital officer for TBWA Worldwide told the Toronto Ad and Sales Club’s annual Internet Day luncheon yesterday. But inevitably the unique new features and opportunities of the new medium emerge in their own right.

 

And now is the time for digital marketing and advertising to go beyond the traditional media “real estate” approach of selling time and space and embrace the opportunities for true consumer engagement, DeCourcy told the capacity crowd of 600.

 

“We really do have to move past that,” she said. “Technology is an enabler not a destination.”

 

Engagement is the new holy grail of interactive marketing, she said. Although the challenge is that the word means different thing to different people and is tough to measure.

 

It’s not enough just to get attention. Ideally engagement includes “time spent,”  “a relevant experience” and “having a conversation over time in an emotional and rational sense,” she said.

 

A Toronto native, now-based in New York, DeCourcy will chair the Cyber Lions jury at the 2008 Cannes Lions International Advertising Festival in France later this month.  DeCourcy, who was creative director at the pioneering Toronto digital shop ICE before  it closed in the 2000 dotcom meltdown, went on to senior creative positions at Organic and JWT in the U.S. before taking  the top digital job at TBWA about a year ago.

 

DeCourcy applied communications theorist Marhsall McLuhan’s comments about the impact of TV during the 1960s to the impact of the Web over the past 14 years. In essence, she said, by changing how we view the world, the world has changed.

 

“The Internet is not an ad platform,” said DeCourcy. Rather it is causing a “social revolution on a scale of the industrial and sexual revolutions.”

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 5:24 PM EDT
Tuesday, 27 May 2008
Ushering a new era in music marketing
Topic: Online marketing

Some of the most intense discussions at the mesh conference 08  in Toronto last week came during the “Where’s the Business in Show Business - Music and the Web” panel addressing what the recording industry is and isn’t doing to find a new business model in an era when consumers can instantly access for free just about any piece of music they want.

As lead singer and song writer with band Moist and as a solo artist, David Usher has sold over 1.3 million records, won five Juno Awards and has had 11 different songs reach number one on radio charts. And while he was raised on the old-school music marketing model, Usher has whole heartedly embraced online and social media tools –including building his own online community at Davidusher.com - to connect with fans and continue to earn a living from making music.  Through his company CloudiD Media, Usher is also a social media consultant for EMI Music Publishing as well as other Canadian arts organizations. At his “other” blog, CloudiD.com, Usher writes about the intersection of art, technology and communications.

In this highlight from the mesh panel, Usher talks about what’s changed in music marketing and how he engages his audiences now.

 


 

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.

 


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 1:46 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 23 June 2008 2:07 PM EDT
Monday, 26 May 2008
Creators will be in driver's seat as online video matures
Topic: Online marketing

 

Blip.tv co-founder and COO Dina Kaplin predicts that creators of video content will soon and quickly follow the path of recording artists in seizing control of what succeeds both in online video and over the air broadcasting from broadcast networks.

Kaplin, a former White House staffer, broadcast journalist and MTV politics and technology producer, predicted that as online show creators begin to draw audiences in the tens of millions for their programming they will be in the driver’s seat as traditional broadcasters inevitably seek them out to work their magic. See her comments here.

 



Kaplin, whose New York-based double Webby-award winning video sharing web site enables independent producers to create their own TV shows for the Internet, made the comments during the panel on the future of online video at the mesh conference 08 in Toronto May 21. 

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.

 


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 1:53 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 23 June 2008 2:10 PM EDT
Thursday, 22 May 2008
Don't give up..
Topic: Online marketing

 

Late in the Building a Brand on the Web panel at the mesh conference yesterday day, Ronhit Bhargava asked how many people in the packed room (at least 150) had been told they had to “give up control of their brand” online. A few hands went up, along with a lot of nodding.

That’s totally the wrong approach, Bhargava insisted. It’s like throwing your hands up and just giving up.

You still have to control your brand, make key decisions about what you want to stand for and who you want to speak to. You do need to learn to “share control” with consumers. But that’s a far cry from ceding control entirely.

I go to a lot of these kinds of conferences and read a lot lately about this issue. I can’t recall such a common sense challenge to the mantra of the customer is totally in control in the digital world. It was refreshing. And I’m sure the perspective would be a big relief to marketers whose guts have been telling them to resist the chorus of advice telling them to give up control.

Bhargava, by the way, is the Washington DC-based senior VP, digital strategy & marketing at the Ogilvy 360 Digital Influence Group. He also writes the well regarded Influential Marketing blog and has just published the book Personality Not Included: Why Companies Lose Their Authenticity and How Great Brands Get It Back (McGraw-Hill). Think we’ll be hearing more about this book.

It was a pretty good panel all round actually.

Shortly before Bhargava’s comment, Maggie Fox, head of the Social Media Group had floated that marketers really only control about 25% of their brand image (conceding it would have been better if she could remember the source of this stat), and that things like consumer word of mouth, media and even employee communications have huge impacts. I don’t see that statement as necessarily inconsistent with Bhargava’s, even if you might debate the per centages.

However, Michael Garrity, president and CEO of the CommunityLend –a Toronto start up in the social lending field that plans to go live in August-  got the biggest laugh of the afternoon by stressing that the best way to build a brand on the web is to “not suck.”

Seriously. The product or service stands or falls on its merits, and no amount of banner ads, blogger relations or Facebook communities can save a bad product from itself.

It was essentially the same point that Lane Merrifield, founder of Club Penquin –which everyone knows, after being founded and nurtured in rural B.C.,was sold to Disney last year for $700 million- made in his morning keynote conversation. Merrifield, in fact apologized to those who’d come hoping to hear the magic recipe for marketing a massive community like Club Penquin (12 million users, 700,000 paying subscribers). They’re only now interviewing for their first marketing director. His best advice: do a great product and do it better than anyone else.

So near the end of the branding on the web panel when moderator Mark Evans commented that Club Penquin had built its brand without spending anything on marketing at all, it occurred to me that that simply wasn’t true. They spent a ton on product development. And in the end Club Penquin’s marketing was the quality of its product.

If the Web has changed anything, it has taken away the ability of marketing to “fake” a brand. The ultimate key to success in branding on the Web is having a product that markets itself. And that doesn’t happen by accident. And for sure, as Bhargava would have it, marketers also still have total control over their product development. (Not that it couldn’t hurt to share some control there either-but that’s a conversation for another day.)

 

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 1:24 PM EDT
Tuesday, 20 May 2008
Marketing in an era of phatic comminications
Topic: Online marketing

MIT anthropologist Grant McCracken gave a decidedly non-linier talk during the opening evening session at the Institute of Communications Agencies Future Flash 2.0 at Niagara-On-The-Lake last Wednesday.  Of all the presentations I’ve heard in the past week –and believe me, between our own In:fluencia Digital Interactive Marketing Conference featuring Chris Anderson and Paul Gillin and the Canadian Marketing Association ’s annual convention, I’ve got an overload of good presentations percolating in my brain right now- this one was perhaps the most salient. That’s as much because of the plethora of intellectually challenging ideas McCracken unleashed in his hour or so, as to the polar reactions to it I encountered during the social that followed at the Jackson-Triggs Estate.

The Canadian-born McCracken spoke to 80 or so senior Canadian ad agency executives and a few guests about “marketing for the new media and the new consumer.” His style and content seemed to channel Marshall McLuhan –with a bit of Dustin Hoffman’s Rainman in the mix­­- in that there were a lot of accessible probes and observations that, added up, seemed a bit chaotic and confusing. Some people find that stimulating. Some find it off-putting.

Some typical take aways, culled from my rather disjointed notes nearly a week later (did I mention the venue was a very nice winery):

         McCracken talked about how a lot of the IT-focused people at MIT are bugged by Twitter and how’s it used for seeming trivia, or “exhaust data.” All this brain power and technology, their reasoning goes, and people use it to tell each other they’re going to the store or the bathroom now.  But McCracken noted that in anthropological terms the efforts by people, especially by teens and young twentysomethings, to stay in constant contact with their social networks through things like SMS, instant messaging, Facebook and Twitter, are akin to the gruntings and mutterings of primates (or the tweets and twitters of birds). It’s called phatic communications, and it’s all about saying “I’m here, you’re here, we’re all fine.”

          In a sense, McCracken said, we’re “all Korean now” in that we in North America are now “always on” via cell phones and other PDAs –something that not long ago was unique to South Korean culture. And our contacts never die; indeed, they multiply. With things like Facebook and Linked In we’re now able to stay in touch with everyone we’ve ever known with as much energy and efficiently we might have used to keep in touch with our dozen or so closest friends and associates in the recent past.

        McCracken observed that the new consumer see themselves as producers, as well as consumers, of content. They’re collaborative and experimental. And in that context, the old “stand and deliver” model of marketing is obsolete, he said. In fact, the day of the finely crafted in stone USP (unique selling proposition) is done.  The new consumer is looking for dialogue and exchange, not a heavily-scripted one-way monologue shouted at them.

What should marketers specifically be doing in this new world?:

• Reward the “editors” and “curators,” for one thing. These self appointed connectors can be your allies in spreading your message if they are motivated and enabled.

• Enable “distributors,” or as McCracken put it more bluntly: “shoot the lawyers.” It’s now an open source world, and anything that impedes passing on content that in the past we’d try to control through things like ridged intellectual property rights rules will cause messages to be ignored. You have to “release control” and “give to get,” he said.

• Enable social networks, especially using mobile devices. The IT guys may not like it, but “tiny bursts” of content (whether “exhaust data” or not) makes the social networks hum. Make lots of them, and design them to be adaptable.

McCracken had much, much more to say, but I long ago passed the point where this post constituted a “tiny burst” and you get the drift.

But, as I said up top, for me the most interesting thing was the reactions of people at the ICA event. Almost to a person the ad agency executives I encountered got a starry-eyed look and were effusive in their praise of McCracken’s presentation. Not so much the reaction from Association of Canadian Advertisers president Ron Lund.

Lund’s gut response when the presentation was over was “and… so what.” Yes, Lund said, what McCracken had to say was pretty cool and interesting… but what can you actually do about it? How do we act on this stuff?

I’ve always found Ron’s down to earth approach refreshing. There is something to be said for remembering that when someone is dazzling you with their brilliance, the fact that they’re saying things you don’t quite understand might not be because you are the one who doesn’t “get it.” And remember, as ACA head he is the voice in Canada of the C-suits in the traditional marketer sector, which is populated with people who have –and by their job functions are required to have- a similar skeptical “show me” attitude toward all things new, including  the emerging new interactive marketing paradigm.

That said, new technologies are enabling consumers –and the rules for engaging them – to change at an accelerating pace. No, the jury’s not in yet on what to do about and with a lot of this stuff. But even if we haven’t figured out how to –or even if we can- use these new mediums and trends for marketing purposes yet, we do need to learn about them. It’s not Grant McCracken’s fault the new world is a complex place.

 

 

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.

 


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 12:37 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 23 June 2008 12:56 PM EDT
Friday, 16 May 2008
Making e-mail work harder
Topic: Online marketing

Companies are missing huge opportunities for up-selling and even simple branding with the slew of transactional e-mails they regularly send to customers.

Even modest improvements to transactional e-mails can result in reduced call centre costs and increased average order sizes through cross- and up-selling, Ryan Deutsch, director, strategic services with StrongMail Systems of Redwood City, Calf. told the Canadian Marketing Association annual conference earlier this month.

Transactional e-mails are “anything that facilitates or helps a transaction or sale,” and can include order confirmations, etickets, billing notices, shipping notices and even password changes.  Many organizations aren’t even conscious of how many email contacts they have with customers, and certainly in most cases marketing departments are out of the loop on automated “machine to machine” messages from shipping, order processing or other IT-driven departments, Deutsch notes. In the case of one client he was working with recently, the organization had 80 different potential streams of communications with customers, and the marketing team was only aware of just two of them.

The average open and click through rates for transactional messages are much higher than for commercial messages like sales offers and newsletters. According to a study by ClickZ.com in the U.S., 26.9% of commercial e-mails are actually opened, while a whopping 70% of transactional messages are opened. The gap for click through rates is even more stunning: just 7.2% of commercial messages are clicked through, while 50% of transactional messages get clicked.

For that reason alone, companies should be sure they get the branding and cross sell messages right, Deutsch says.

Some organizations like expedia, itunes and Eddie Bauer do a great job of both the branding and promotional offers in transactional messages, Deutsch says. In the case of expedia, order confirmations always inquire if the recipient also needs to book a hotel room or car rental with their travel faire.  Itunes order confirmations often show items that others who purchased the same thing the recipient is about the buy also bought.

Still, too often transactional e-mails are bland plain text affairs that don’t even use branding that’s consistent with the overall marketing messaging, Deutsch notes. Sometimes that’s because companies fear running afoul of regulations governing e-mail contact.

There are indeed rules guarding against turning transactional messages into stealth ad messages. But regulations in the U.S. –which are largely the same in Canada- allow branding and selling on these messages as long as the transactional elements are front and centre and constitute about two thirds of the total message content. And there are few limits to creativity. The only real no fly zone is in using the message line for selling.

 

Originally written for and posted on In:fluencia Digital, a beta site created with Editions Infopresse to serve the Canadian online and interactive marketing, communications and media communities. The site’s development is in hiatus.


Posted by sutter or mckenzie at 3:11 PM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older